So I was casting about trying to figure out what I would do for my final blog post when a friend reminded me of Anastasia. Before Don Bluth fell into obscurity I really did enjoy his films as a child. However, what interests me more so than the animation’s style or any Don Bluth vs Big-Name-Animation-Company showdown is the history. I remember the myth about Anastasia and how it was rumored she possibly survived the execution of her entire family with the help of a servant. There was a major Anastasia impersonator Anna Anderson, however, when her remains were examined it was proven conclusively that she was not Anastasia. While this impostor bit plays into the film, I am more interested in Grigori Rasputin, a man who possibly “helped to discredit the tsarist government, leading to the fall of the Romanov dynasty, in 1917″.
In the film Rasputin is stuck in a state of un-deadness as a living corpse which seems like an odd move to make for the animators, until you learn of the myths surrounding Rasputin’s death–or rather his refusal to die. Here is a clip from the film where Rasputin sings a song explaining his want for revenge and shows his existence in limbo/refusal to die. In real life he was supposedly poisoned, shot multiple times, tied up an tossed into a half frozen river yet escaped his bonds and attempted to claw at the ice to escape. Some of this has been disproved and some of it given more credence, but the fact remains these myths have marked the movie. Rasputin exists in this movie as a person who will not die, and perseveres to achieve his goals, no matter how twisted. So while the movie is a fantasized version of this inability to be truly killed outright the first time around, it synthesizes with the history of the real Rasputin.
I commented on this blog and this blog

6 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 25, 2010 at 3:49 pm
mtaylo7
We watched Anastasia in my Dual-enrollment class in 12th grade because of the many views it raised about the lore behind not only Anastasia but also Rasputin. I believe the the movie represents the idea of Rasputin not being able to be killed even though the man is immortal.
April 25, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Blog Post #13: Because This is What History of Animation is All About… Teaching History through Animation. « Animated
[...] commented on Samantha Francis’s blog and Ian Crawford’s blog. Published [...]
April 25, 2010 at 9:45 pm
bonbonhistory
I have a friend who is in Russia now for a study-abroad semester. She actually went to the castle and they had a wax person of Rasputin and he was very important to the overall story of Anastasia. It is an interesting look at Anastasia to pay attention to how important he was to the folk story and how he is still remembered today. I always thought he was so creepy in the movie but I loved his bat sidekick.
April 26, 2010 at 12:38 am
Osrabit
I founbd Rasputin to make a very interesting villain, particularly in his undead state. I like how the film used a historical event as a jumping off point for it’s own story as opposed to rewriting one like Pochahontas. I liked the white bat as well.
April 27, 2010 at 1:50 am
joegayk
It’s interesting that Rasputin was used as a villain in this film, because most historical account point to him being very much welcomed into the court of Nicholas II. I have to say that of all the animated retelling of historical stories, Anastasia really was one of the worst. It was such a stretch that they should have considered maybe calling it something else! Either way the manner in which they depicted Rasputin was pretty eerie, and is a good exploration of the typical villain in animated movies.
April 27, 2010 at 1:54 am
Post #13: Look what we can do! « Joe Gayk's Blog
[...] see my comments on the blogs of Samantha and [...]